Wichita Falls city councilors approved a sole source contract between Wichita Falls and Jody Wade Enterprises and Collins Motor Company for the towing and impound services required by the city.
A 6-1 vote, with Councilor Tim Ingle objecting, approved a sole-source method for receiving and maintaining Wichita Falls Police Department vehicle inventory. The deal eliminates the wrecker rotation list.
Several people, including other towing and wrecker company operators, voiced concerns over the proposal. Their main concern was the elimination of the rotation list. They said they were under the impression the list would be reduced to wrecking services, with Wade taking over impounding.
Wichita Falls residents still have the option to call the towing company of their choice in an accident. If a person involved in an accident has no preference, Wade’s company will be called by default.
Ricky Cantu of Cantu towing and Al Palmatary of Al’s Automotive presented a joint proposal to the city, as well. Wichita Falls Police Chief Manuel Borrego said Wade just made a good offer.
The offer includes exclusive towing rights for the city, as well as complimentary towing and roadside assistance for city vehicles. The impound lot will be accessible 24 hours a day.
Before acceptance of the proposal, patrol officers had to spend their time waiting on wreckers at the impound, and those with vehicles at the impound were only able to access their vehicles during regular business hours.
“This will save the chief an extraordinary amount of time. After 5 p.m. a police officer has to open the impound yard on every impound, and they have to wait on that wrecker to unload that vehicle. If someone needs to get their vehicle, it takes a police officer down there. We’re talking about saving numerous amount of police resources for the city,” Wade said.
While Palmatary, Cantu and others recognized the city’s needs and realized Wade presented a good offer, they did not understand why wrecking services were not continued on a rotation cycle. They argued it wouldn’t cost the city any money and would provide them with a continuous source of income.
“It cuts our business income in half. Half of our income was from the city rotation contract. We were moved down here for AAA Texas, which is a roadside assistance company,” Cantu said. “We only had 25 days to bid, and I got it a week late. This is a million dollar deal. ... We knew it was going to cost us a lot of money to be able to play this game.”
Borrego noted that if neither proposal received met the requirements the city was looking for, neither would have been accepted, saying he wants the best for both the city and its residents.
“If it didn’t meet our goals as a city or department ... and make sure our evidence vehicles were secured, certainly we would have to have readjusted our thoughts and plans. Our impound was in a critical position of overcrowding. We had so much overflow of vehicles we didn’t know where to put them,” Borrego said.
The city impound averaged 144 vehicles each month in 2012, while its maximum capacity is 118.
“We want the city and the citizens to know that this proposal was done for the best interest of the citizens, and they’ll have 24-hour access to their vehicle that’s either impounded or involved in an accident,” Wade said.
Wade’s five-year rent-free lease of over 18,000 square feet at 3101 Armory Road, formerly Bonham Elementary, also includes vehicle space for 50 evidence impounds, vehicle space for 30 seizure impounds, a $25,000 move-in allowance, space for at least 250 impounded vehicles and vehicle auction services.
Cantu suggested a better solution would have been to get a company contracted for storage. He and Palmatary said they are not sure of their businesses’ futures.
“We employ about four employees, and it’s going to have to be a decision we sit back and watch whether we’re going to stay in Wichita Falls and keep doing business. I know we will definitely lose one employee. There’s not enough business for four (employees),” Cantu said.
Cantu said he could do private property impounds, but it’s not a business he wants to involve himself with.
“It’s not a business where people are happy to see you or come get their cars. It’s just a bad business. Sure, it’s necessary, but this is a small community, and I think ... it soon grabs you a bad name as a company,” Cantu said.
The other companies felt misled and felt the request for proposals was vague in its specifications. Borrego said the offer was basically to see what would be offered. Wade previously submitted what Borrego called a “skeletal proposal” to the city which was denied.
Palmatary believes the deal was done under the table and preset.
“What do you think they’re doing when they set up a whole facility that nobody knows anything about? Then the contract is exactly what (the facility) was,” Palmatary said.
Cantu and Palmatary said they requested a copy of the original proposal submitted by Wade in November but were denied a copy.
Borrego said he knew they needed to send out a formal request and see what other options were available to the department.

Dwindling Lakes
First hand look at Moore, OK destruction
Hot enough to fryan ...





















Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 34
carp writes:
Your right Al, way under the table.
Ive never had any respect for Jody, now, Im having second thoughts on others involved.
Wichita_Willie writes:
"Wade’s five-year rent-free lease of over 18,000 square feet at 3101 Armory Road, formerly Bonham Elementary, also includes vehicle space for 50 evidence impounds, vehicle space for 30 seizure impounds, a $25,000 move-in allowance, space for at least 250 impounded vehicles and vehicle auction services."
So let me understand this right. Wade not only gets exclusive treatment from the city in regards to his impound and towing, he is also getting a five year, rent free lease of the Bonham Elementary site in which to conduct this business?
Whoa folks. This isn't right at all. If true, this has to be one of the shadiest deals to come this way in decades.
And what makes me the most ticked off is that every councillor except Tim Ingle voted for this.
Trapper writes:
Now I must rescind any GOOD comments that I have made in regard to Borrego.
The odor coming out of the Chief's office and the City Council Chambers just got very, very bad.
Wichita_Willie writes:
I agree Trapper... I agree. Borrego lost any support and trust that I had in him.
Wichita_Willie writes:
I just re-read the offer from the city. Are they really giving Wade a $25,000 move in allowance so that he can set up his business at Bonham in addition to leasing it to him for five years rent free?
And Borrego has the nerve to say that Wade's proposal was the best one submitted? What proposal would this be? To get the city to hand over a site, give him start up money, etc. and on top of that to be granted an exclusive contract with the city?
YHWH-Nissi writes:
I checked the tax records. It looks like the armory building is owned by one of wade's businesses. So it would be the city getting the free lease and the $25,000
Yankeedude writes:
No company should have a monopoly such as this. Wade has long tried to enact deals which look shady. In my humble opinion he and his company cannot be trusted. It is unfortunate the city council can't see through him like the public can.
alyssak (staff) writes:
The city of Wichita Falls is receiving those benefits, not Wade. The city will use the $25,000 for office related expenses to move into the new space, from what I understand.
Sorry for any confusion.
YHWH-Nissi writes:
When the county or the city want to repair a stretch of road they can do deals with multiple contractors, each one repairing a limited portion of the roadway. The government can also do a deal with only one contractor who will repair the entire stretch of road; this sole source contract does not create a monopoly. The city's actions yesterday did not limit the other towing businesses rights to operate in Wichita County.
taxman writes:
And after the 5 year lease with Wade??? What will be the rent then? I hope that PD will be in a new location with more than enough real estate to house their own impound yard at that time.
I do find it quite interesting that Donald Melton DBA Donnie's Wrecker Service purchased the building from Wichita County (which leaseed it to WFISD) which in turned sold it to Wade.
Wade towing / wrecker business is made up of Collins, Big Daddy and Donnie's Wrecker Service.
Don't like how this deal was done.
Alethia writes:
They did cut them out of City Rotation which is 50% of their business. On the other hand, the City created a problem where there wasn't one. They have created a need for capacity that didn't exist in the past. There is no need to haul off vehicles for every person that goes to jail. Most can have someone pick up their vehicle and alot of times, there is someone on the scene that can take the vehicle. They chose to impound. It's ALL about money. The root of all evil. We have just created a link between law enforcement and towing companies. I'm not sure this was a very well thought out plan.
meatman52 writes:
here we go again ,our city gods at work.How many times are we going to roll over and save this "WADE" character. It seems like everytime you pick the paper up he's made the news ,always a problem ,but lets give him another chance and let's throw perks in to. don't you think the other guys need a chance this time.
Trapper writes:
Alethia, when the driver of a vehicle is arrested and no one else is in the vehicle, it must be impounded, otherwise the City/County/State(who ever the arresting agency is) is responsible for any damage that might befall the vehicle, hence the policy of impound.
Texasczech63 writes:
Instead of simply complaining........ how about the citizens of Wichita county and the city of Wichita Falls recall all involved.....maybe convince an agency outside the city or county to investigate.
It's your tax money they are squandering yet again.....hold them accountable.
Texanforlife writes:
The legal question now is did they impede or hinder or even incapacitate an established business ability to have free enterprise. It appears to me to be so. I hope this contract is recinded. Although many of us have to give our tax money to these bureaucrats we do not have to accept their actions.
oldhermit writes:
Good job! What shall we privatize next? The police? water department? Trash pick up?
Wichita_Willie writes:
Might as well privatize the lakes. The city sure doesn't seem to be concerned with cleaning them out.
Blackhawk writes:
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Hangman writes:
Dude, you don't post people's real name. That's over the line. I'm suggesting removal.
GPR writes:
Obamacare?
Trapper writes:
TC, unfortunately you can not recall the County Elected officials. I have spent a lot of time researching THAT option. I even had someone ready to put up the money to finance the recall.
I don't think that the elected City officials are exempt though, but I will be checking that out.
Trapper writes:
OK, City Council Members and the Mayor ARE subject to recall. So says the Attorney General of Texas.
Wichita_Willie writes:
Yes you can recall a city council member and/or the mayor.
Does what happened to Mayor Altman ring a bell?
Wichita_Willie writes:
Well, well, well. I decided this morning to drive by Wade's new impound lot on Armory Road, and guess what I saw?
Sign after sign advertising Bill Altman's law firm, some announcing that if you should have your vehicle towed away and impounded, to call Altman's law firm and that he will help you.
The plot thickens!!!
Trapper writes:
Just keep watching. It will get a lot thicker and will smell a lot worse.
fallztownmex writes:
I wish taht was possible. I'm disgusted with the council members. To think, I used to like a few of them. I would so vote to recall my council member.
carp writes:
Here we go again.
s_i_t writes:
I'm curious? Has any of you that have commented read the proposal/contract of what Jody Wade is offering the City? Judging by your comments, it's pretty safe to say...NO! (except for STAFF)
Before you pass judgment on someone, find out what you're talking about. You will be amazed at what you're missing!
Hangman writes:
We're not missing Wade basically bribing the city with $25,000 and free rent for five years.
s_i_t writes:
Free rent? HE BOUGHT THE BUILDING LAST YEAR! You missed the boat...AGAIN!
Texasczech63 writes:
I read somewhere that viewing the original proposal was denied.......how about you look into that Piondexter.
s_i_t writes:
If the request was made BEFORE the contract was signed, then yes, the request would've been denied. After the contract is signed, then anyone can file an Open Records request. There, I looked into it!
Texasczech63 writes:
I will send one of my employee's over to file the FOIA on Monday morning.....then it's copy and paste time Nancy Grace.....I know how much he loves that.
Nothing like a little sunshine to clear up a situation.
PernelI writes:
Al's Automotive has always been dependable. He will be missed.
Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.